A point Professor Burton made in class, how sermons
were viewed by the current society, caught my interest. While introducing the
sermons as pieces of literature and of rhetorical significance, he mentioned that
most scholars at the time were focused on religious writing. I did a little
more research on the culture surrounding sermons and preaching to better
understand the context and impact these two sermons could have had.
What first startled me was the number of preachers at the
time of the reformation and their role in society. There were thousands of
preachers in Florence at the time of the reformation and they were largely
viewed as entertainment (Howard 1). Preachers existed as varying levels of
legitimacy. A preacher would rise in influence and wealth completely dependent
on his popularity. His salary was dependent on what the church and his audience
believed his work to be worth (Howard 4). Thus a preacher giving a sermon, deserving enough attention to be recorded must have built his reputation over a
long period of time and would have been well-known in the community.
Given the social popularity of attending sermons, the fame
of the preachers and the sensitivity and timeliness of the subject matter, I
think it is safe to assume that these sermons would have reached a lot of
people and had significant influence. Peter Howard addressed the genius of
these men in “The Impact of Preaching in Renaissance Florance.”
“In thinking about the effectiveness of the pulpit oratory, and the way
in which the pulpit ‘conversed’ with society too much emphasis is placed on the
individual preacher. The perspective of the convent school also suggests that
the voice of the prominent preacher from the pulpit was only the articulation
of what was being debated more generally within the studia of the city and
disseminated more broadly by work-a-day preachers around the city”(Howard 12).
What is so genius about these sermons is less the subject
matter and more the rhetorical presentation. It seems that if many preachers
were all trying to communicate similar messages it would be your skill at
presentation and persuasion would bring you recognition and a
salary.
Howard,
Peter. "The Impact of Preaching in Renaissance Florence: Fra Niccolò Da
Pisa at San Lorenzo." The Impact of
Preaching in Renaissance Florence: Fra Niccolò Da Pisa at San Lorenzo.
Monash University, Australia, 2004. Web. 16 Sept. 2015. <http://www.academia.edu/4424995/The_Impact_of_Preaching_in_Renaissance_Florence_Fra_Niccol%C3%B2_da_Pisa_at_San_Lorenzo>.
This is a fascinating idea. I thought the professors comments made sense, but it took reading your blog post for the significance of this to hit home. Good work and research. This could probably go the distance to the ebook.
ReplyDeleteI makes me wonder how much of the content of the sermons is the personal opinion of the preacher and how much is the official opinion of the church. Granted, there were many preachers who were not associated with a specific sect, but I still wonder.
ReplyDelete